SB193 Relating to evidence in certain civil actions that entry on a property by a license holder with a concealed handgun was forbidden.

↑Expands gun access ✓ Reviewed model said: Restricts · Lets a business's no-carry sign be used as evidence of liability for crimes on its property, which discourages banning concealed carry. v5 read it as restricting. model confidence 80%

Makes evidence of a business's posted notice forbidding concealed handguns admissible in civil suits against the business for injuries from crimes on the property, and states that it supports a cause of action against the business, so businesses face greater legal risk for posting such notices and a

The fact that a card, sign, or other document described by Section 30.06(c)(3), Penal Code, is posted on the property of a business or any other evidence that a business owner exercised the business owner's option to forbid the carrying of a concealed handgun by a license holder on the property: (1) is admissible as evidence in a trial on the merits in an action: (A) against the business owner; and (B) in which the cause of action arises from serious bodily injury or death arising from a criminal act occurring on the property; and (2) supports a cause of action described by Subdivision (1)

✓ Quote verified word for word in the bill text