PolicyWinds
Topic and direction labels are AI-assisted, and each one quotes the bill text it is based on. How labels work
New York · 2025-2026 General Assembly

S00260 Relates to extreme risk protection orders; defines "exception"; authorizes a police officer or district attorney to file an application for an extreme risk protection order if found that a person meets the requirements of an exception pursuant to section 6340 of the civil practice law and rules; makes related provisions.

Direction

Firearms red flag erpoAI label

Restricts gun access model confidence 90%

Expands the definition of risk that triggers mandatory filing of an ERPO petition by police or prosecutors and updates the criteria courts use to issue temporary, final, or renewed ERPOs, so more people are likely to have their firearms access restricted via red-flag orders.

shall file such application upon the receipt of credible information that an individual is likely to engage in conduct that would result in [deleted: serious harm to themself or others, as defined in paragraph one or two] [deleted: of subdivision (a) of section 9.39 of the mental hygiene law]: (a) substantial risk of physical harm to themself as manifested by threats of or attempts at suicide or serious bodily harm or other conduct demonstrating that such respondent is dangerous to themself; or (b) a substantial risk of physical harm to other persons as manifested by homicidal or other violent

✓ Quote verified word for word in the bill text

  1. Filed (completed)
  2. Committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both
  5. Governor
  6. Law

Status: Died (session ended)

Last action
2026-03-31: REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO CODES
Filed
2025-01-08
Committee
Codes
Sponsor
Monica Martinez D + 1 cosponsor (1 D)

Why the model tagged it this way: The bill substantively addresses only the firearms/red-flag-erpo topic. It revises the statutory criteria for when law enforcement must file ERPO petitions and when courts may issue them by replacing a cross-reference to the Mental Hygiene Law's 'serious harm' definition with a new two-prong test focused on self-harm/suicide risk or violent behavior toward others; this broadens the set of circumstances that can support an ERPO. It simultaneously creates explicit exceptions allowing discretion not to file in certain cases (prior prohibition, existing order, long incarceration, or specific minor

Related bills

Hearings and calendar

Votes

DateChamberMotionYea-Nay
2026-03-31SSenate Judiciary Committee Vote18-1Passed

Sponsors

Text versions

History (5 actions)
DateChamberAction
2026-03-31SREPORTED AND COMMITTED TO CODES
2026-01-07SREFERRED TO JUDICIARY
2025-12-12SPRINT NUMBER 260A
2025-12-12SAMEND AND RECOMMIT TO JUDICIARY
2025-01-08SREFERRED TO JUDICIARY