model confidence 90%
Withholds federal SEAR security funding from jurisdictions with policies limiting information-sharing or detainer compliance with federal immigration authorities, and reallocates it to ICE enforcement operations, so more immigration enforcement.
sanctuary jurisdictions are ineligible to receive Federal funds for SEAR support for events taking place in such jurisdictions
✓ Quote verified word for word in the bill text
model confidence 85%
Conditions eligibility for federal event-security funds on jurisdictions certifying full compliance with immigration laws including information-sharing and detainer requests, and reallocates withheld funds to ICE for arrests, detentions, and removals, so more state and local cooperation with federal
the sanctuary jurisdiction fails to certify to the Secretary of Homeland Security that it is in full compliance with the immigration laws ... including section 642 of the Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996
⚠ Quote could not be matched to the bill text: treat this label with caution
Stage: Committee · step 2 of 6
Why the model tagged it this way: The bill defines sanctuary jurisdictions by their limits on sharing immigration-status information or honoring ICE detainers, then makes them ineligible for DHS SEAR event-security funding unless they certify compliance; withheld amounts are redirected to ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations with priority for criminal noncitizens and border removals. This expands immigration enforcement and state-federal cooperation by penalizing and incentivizing against sanctuary policies. No provisions address firearms, transgender issues, or abortion.
| Date | Chamber | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-25 | Libra | Introduced in Senate |
| 2026-02-25 | Senat | Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. |